Changing Behavior through Fun

The smart folks over at Volkswagen have stumbled across the same truth that Antanas Mockus shared with us during the DeLange Conference earlier this year: sometimes humor is the best way to change behavior.

Case in point, at a particular subway station in Sweden everyone rode the escalator up, virtually no one chose the stairs. Well, stairs are clearly a little healthier since they require more effort to walk up… so is there something that we can do to encourage people to make the healthy choice? See for yourself:

This is a really fun and entertaining approach to problem solving -- and it’s also pretty smart. Many well-intentioned government officials might have proposed a “health law” stating that only the elderly and disabled may use the escalator. This would have had several consequences:

  1. People would have been pissed off.
  2. The people who obeyed and took the stairs would do so begrudgingly.
  3. A lot of people would ignore the rule, forcing the government to decide whether to enforce it through punishment or not enforce it at all.
  4. If they enforce the rule through fines or other punishment, people will be that much more bitter, and people will still disobey.
  5. If they don’t enforce it, people soon realize the rule isn’t taken seriously, and most people will ignore it.
  6. Eventually you’ve either created a major enforcement problem, or a rule that nobody enforces or obeys (and therefore the desired behavior change won’t happen).

It’s critical to think outside the box to solve issues that are cultural in nature. Many, many societal issues are cultural, and have to be addressed through culture, not law. The problem is usually that people grew up with behavior shown to them by their parents, they’ve never seen or tried anything different, and so they can’t imagine how there could be anything better.

For instance, I’ve suggested before that Houston needs to change its culture of “Dress-clothing” to be more climate appropriate. Why? Office buildings, churches, schools etc. throughout our region regularly set their temperature to 68 degrees so that people in suits will be comfortable. Many people, especially women, are not comfortable sitting still at 68 degrees unless they are wearing heavier clothing.

So in order to be comfortable indoors you must dress for cool weather. Dressing for cool weather makes going outside in 95 degree heat unbearable. Therefore, we believe that people “cannot, will not, and do not” walk anywhere because of the heat.

But think of how much energy cost we could save if buildings typically set their indoor temperature to 78 instead of 68 in the summer. The cost savings would be dramatic! In order to make this comfortable, we would have to dress appropriately. And, if we dresses appropriately, we might find being outdoors in the summer wasn’t as unbearable as we thought.

How could we achieve this change? How about having “Dress for the Weather Week” as a community event? Let people see and experience what dressing for the weather does, and let’s measure the energy savings we achieve. After the results are in, and after many people are exposed to this new behavior, people attitudes and perceptions may shift enough to cause a lasting change. It won’t happen all at once, but if we held a “Dress for the Weather Week” every year, we’d probably find that within a decade or so that it was standard behavior throughout the summer.

It’s something to think about, anyway.


Posted: Thursday, October 15th, 2009 at 8:02 am
Categories: sustain, think
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Share:
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

3 Comments

  1. “Dress for the Weather Week” sounds like a good idea but it will never happen without coercion.

    “Why do men wear suits?” is the question you need to ponder. Its answer, I speculate, has nothing to do with fun or fashion. Just the opposite! A suit is all about power. And therefore, 68 degrees is also about power.

    To alter culture, you must alter power. Fun can be used effectively to this end, because many kinds of power derive from the willing submission of the masses to a rut or tradition. If the masses take another road… suits could lose.

  2. In the U.S., the transit authority would get sued when some jr-higher injured himself trying to play “Giant Steps”

  3. In Tokyo, the government began a ties-off program, encouraging men to go to work without jackets or ties in the summer, so that air conditioners would be set for a higher temperature. Most American cities, including Houston, would do well to learn how Tokyo is implementing its program. I believe Tokyo started by making senior government leaders follow it, encouraging business to adopt the same dress code.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>