<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A personal aside: T-Mobile is fantastic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neohouston.com/2009/04/a-personal-aside-t-mobile-is-fantastic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/04/a-personal-aside-t-mobile-is-fantastic/</link>
	<description>advocating urbanism in the opportunity city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny DiPaolo</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/04/a-personal-aside-t-mobile-is-fantastic/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny DiPaolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=970#comment-269</guid>
		<description>T-Mobile does have pretty good customer service, unfortunately their wireless service kind of stinks in general.   Weak coverage outside of urban centers, and until recently generally a pretty poor selection of hardware.  They were very good about keeping everything unlocked, though, so I&#039;m sort of in the opposite position - I want to like T-Mobile but their product just isn&#039;t good enough.

AT&amp;T&#039;s wireless is pretty good, because I think they&#039;ve retained at least some of tthe level-headed folks that were running things when it was actually AT&amp;T Wireless (which Cingular then bought, and then they were re-branded).  Their internet services division is pretty crap for sure - their offerings aren&#039;t that great, the model of &quot;you must buy the modem&quot; sucks for renters, and the technicians aren&#039;t very prompt.  The price of a mid-grade DSL plan through them is reasonable enough by itself, but you have to have a landline which more than doubles the cost even at the cheapest line price.

That all said, when U-verse is available in my &#039;hood I&#039;m all over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile does have pretty good customer service, unfortunately their wireless service kind of stinks in general.   Weak coverage outside of urban centers, and until recently generally a pretty poor selection of hardware.  They were very good about keeping everything unlocked, though, so I&#8217;m sort of in the opposite position &#8211; I want to like T-Mobile but their product just isn&#8217;t good enough.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s wireless is pretty good, because I think they&#8217;ve retained at least some of tthe level-headed folks that were running things when it was actually AT&amp;T Wireless (which Cingular then bought, and then they were re-branded).  Their internet services division is pretty crap for sure &#8211; their offerings aren&#8217;t that great, the model of &#8220;you must buy the modem&#8221; sucks for renters, and the technicians aren&#8217;t very prompt.  The price of a mid-grade DSL plan through them is reasonable enough by itself, but you have to have a landline which more than doubles the cost even at the cheapest line price.</p>
<p>That all said, when U-verse is available in my &#8216;hood I&#8217;m all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

