<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grand Parkway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/</link>
	<description>advocating urbanism in the opportunity city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr L</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>mr L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-195</guid>
		<description>To all the nuts that LIKE the grade parkway aka 99. It&#039;s being built for big trucks to get around without going throw the city for one.I live in spring my wife&#039;s grandmother is retired an her property is payed for shes lived there for 30 plus years.If this highway 99 goes throw it will takes her house an land. She&#039;s over 65 do you think she wants to start over again i think not.If you move out of the city stop crying about how long it takes you to get to the city i didnt tell you to move there.As for the grade parkway from 249 to 45 widen 2920 whut the hell do u think it goes from 249 to 45. My son thats 10 knows that, in other works the grande parkway is just another way for the city to maker money nothing more nothing less thank you for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all the nuts that LIKE the grade parkway aka 99. It&#8217;s being built for big trucks to get around without going throw the city for one.I live in spring my wife&#8217;s grandmother is retired an her property is payed for shes lived there for 30 plus years.If this highway 99 goes throw it will takes her house an land. She&#8217;s over 65 do you think she wants to start over again i think not.If you move out of the city stop crying about how long it takes you to get to the city i didnt tell you to move there.As for the grade parkway from 249 to 45 widen 2920 whut the hell do u think it goes from 249 to 45. My son thats 10 knows that, in other works the grande parkway is just another way for the city to maker money nothing more nothing less thank you for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoHOUSTON Turns One</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>neoHOUSTON Turns One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-194</guid>
		<description>[...] Grand Parkway. My conceptual alternative to the Grand Parkway, a vast improvement in service with less cost. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grand Parkway. My conceptual alternative to the Grand Parkway, a vast improvement in service with less cost. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mobility Northwest &#124; neoHOUSTON</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>New Mobility Northwest &#124; neoHOUSTON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-193</guid>
		<description>[...] month we had a great discussion about the Grand Parkway. I&#8217;ve been thinking about it a lot since then, and I decided that I wanted to make a little [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month we had a great discussion about the Grand Parkway. I&#8217;ve been thinking about it a lot since then, and I decided that I wanted to make a little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Sure they&#039;ll build one, they&#039;ll just call it a freeway.

What I would suggest is that we build parkways in the future more like the way I-10 is from TC Jester to Patterson (but with fewer lanes in edge, low traffic areas of course). You get an off-ramp which becomes a frontage road for about the distance you need to create a neighborhood commercial center. Then, as you pass through less commercial areas, the frontage road comes back into the main lanes.

The thing is, when building a road out in the boonies you could easily start with the frontage road, then put the main lanes under the middle later on.

This saves money, and actually helps concentrate commercial areas around logical centers rather than developing them as razor thin strips clinging to the major roads. The biggest advantage of this is reduced congestion on the major roads due to the lack of driveway conflicts, and more viable &#039;second row&#039; commercial, places that are one block off the main road. That&#039;s where you find a lot of the best businesses in the inner-loop part of town, places where the rent is cheaper but the traffic is still close by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure they&#8217;ll build one, they&#8217;ll just call it a freeway.</p>
<p>What I would suggest is that we build parkways in the future more like the way I-10 is from TC Jester to Patterson (but with fewer lanes in edge, low traffic areas of course). You get an off-ramp which becomes a frontage road for about the distance you need to create a neighborhood commercial center. Then, as you pass through less commercial areas, the frontage road comes back into the main lanes.</p>
<p>The thing is, when building a road out in the boonies you could easily start with the frontage road, then put the main lanes under the middle later on.</p>
<p>This saves money, and actually helps concentrate commercial areas around logical centers rather than developing them as razor thin strips clinging to the major roads. The biggest advantage of this is reduced congestion on the major roads due to the lack of driveway conflicts, and more viable &#8216;second row&#8217; commercial, places that are one block off the main road. That&#8217;s where you find a lot of the best businesses in the inner-loop part of town, places where the rent is cheaper but the traffic is still close by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie M</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of a road with no drive ways, but I don&#039;t think Houston will ever build one again. The main reason...$$$

Without them, businesses would most likely be hidden from a high traffic road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a road with no drive ways, but I don&#8217;t think Houston will ever build one again. The main reason&#8230;$$$</p>
<p>Without them, businesses would most likely be hidden from a high traffic road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Two lanes is plenty if Grand Parkway isn&#039;t foolishly thought of as the only north-south corridor west of the Beltway.

Let&#039;s consider for a minute why traffic is so much worse in the Uptown/Galleria area than it is in downtown. Put simply, there are dozens of viable routes in and out of Downtown, but only a few in and out of the Galleria.

As areas like Westchase and Memorial City grow up, the potential is there to become even greater traffic nightmares. Why? There&#039;s no parallelism, no alternate routes.

We don&#039;t need more lanes, we need more roads. So, imagine Grand Parkway as just that, a &lt;i&gt;parkway&lt;/i&gt; that starts as 2 lanes each way with all intersections grade separated, and no driveways. Leave room for a third lane in the future. To make things even better, make it a toll road with congestion pricing.

The road won&#039;t carry that much traffic for a long time, and it can be expanded if the need materializes. The need will materialize if that&#039;s the only corridor available, BUT if we expand/improve Highway 6 / 1960, we&#039;ll have a much better transportation system functioning &lt;i&gt;where people actually live&lt;/i&gt; rather than just dismissing the transportation needs of the existing communities in Northwest Houston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two lanes is plenty if Grand Parkway isn&#8217;t foolishly thought of as the only north-south corridor west of the Beltway.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s consider for a minute why traffic is so much worse in the Uptown/Galleria area than it is in downtown. Put simply, there are dozens of viable routes in and out of Downtown, but only a few in and out of the Galleria.</p>
<p>As areas like Westchase and Memorial City grow up, the potential is there to become even greater traffic nightmares. Why? There&#8217;s no parallelism, no alternate routes.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need more lanes, we need more roads. So, imagine Grand Parkway as just that, a <i>parkway</i> that starts as 2 lanes each way with all intersections grade separated, and no driveways. Leave room for a third lane in the future. To make things even better, make it a toll road with congestion pricing.</p>
<p>The road won&#8217;t carry that much traffic for a long time, and it can be expanded if the need materializes. The need will materialize if that&#8217;s the only corridor available, BUT if we expand/improve Highway 6 / 1960, we&#8217;ll have a much better transportation system functioning <i>where people actually live</i> rather than just dismissing the transportation needs of the existing communities in Northwest Houston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I like your idea.  Of course, I&#039;ve supported those &quot;crazy&quot; groups like Sierra Club in the past, and tend to question the need for Grand Parkway in general.  I also tend to think we&#039;d get a better bang for the buck building more flyovers and improving mobility on Highway 6 if we wanted to focus our resources on the far West end of town, or maybe adding capacity to Beltway 8 in some spots.  There are already plenty of opportunities for development in Houston, and plenty of existing roadways that could use increased investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your idea.  Of course, I&#8217;ve supported those &#8220;crazy&#8221; groups like Sierra Club in the past, and tend to question the need for Grand Parkway in general.  I also tend to think we&#8217;d get a better bang for the buck building more flyovers and improving mobility on Highway 6 if we wanted to focus our resources on the far West end of town, or maybe adding capacity to Beltway 8 in some spots.  There are already plenty of opportunities for development in Houston, and plenty of existing roadways that could use increased investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Is there a housing shortage in Westchase or the Energy Corridor that makes the construction of new housing units urgent, or are there just developers with a welfare mentality who done a good job convincing the state government that they just HAVE to have a handout in the form of taxpayer-funded infrastructure to open up new land for them to make money off of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a housing shortage in Westchase or the Energy Corridor that makes the construction of new housing units urgent, or are there just developers with a welfare mentality who done a good job convincing the state government that they just HAVE to have a handout in the form of taxpayer-funded infrastructure to open up new land for them to make money off of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A better idea for the Grand Parkway &#171; Off the Kuff</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>A better idea for the Grand Parkway &#171; Off the Kuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] we must build the Grand Parkway Segment E, then this would be a far more preferable way to do it. Probably less expensive, [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we must build the Grand Parkway Segment E, then this would be a far more preferable way to do it. Probably less expensive, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie M</title>
		<link>http://www.neohouston.com/2009/03/grand-parkway/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohouston.com/?p=627#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I did not mean to be too harsh. I&#039;m simply in favor of the GP.

But I would love Andrew&#039;s idea to replace roads like 1960 with Memorial type roads. They would be useuful all over town really.

Part of the reason I don&#039;t like this idea to REPLACE the GP is b/c it wouldn&#039;t be able to hold the needed demand. 2 lanes is way too few.

But I do like different ideas to stimulate conversation which allow us to see hole&#039;s in each other&#039;s arguments so we can come to a better decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not mean to be too harsh. I&#8217;m simply in favor of the GP.</p>
<p>But I would love Andrew&#8217;s idea to replace roads like 1960 with Memorial type roads. They would be useuful all over town really.</p>
<p>Part of the reason I don&#8217;t like this idea to REPLACE the GP is b/c it wouldn&#8217;t be able to hold the needed demand. 2 lanes is way too few.</p>
<p>But I do like different ideas to stimulate conversation which allow us to see hole&#8217;s in each other&#8217;s arguments so we can come to a better decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

